This season's hottest looks for less

Start saving on designer clothes.





============================================================================================================================ Tom and Benjamin, Thanks to both of you for your replies. As befits my newbie status, I knew hardly any of this. :^) I took Benjamin's advice about validating the new locations with a version of my DLL that didn't have dependent DLLs first, but ran into problems with that. First, I built a standalone version of my DLL, and copied that and my XPT file into \Program Files\Mozilla Firefox \components, deleted the compreg.dat and xpti.dat out of my profile, and executed my test javascript. This worked fine, so I know that my DLL and my XPT files are sane. I then removed my DLL and XPT files from \Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\components, and created a folder called \Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\extensions\{a-guid}, where a-guid is the value of my component CID as a string. I put my install.rdf in the folder, and underneath that, I created libraries and components. I put my XPT in libraries and my (standalone) DLL file in libraries. I deleted compreg.dat and xpti.dat from the profile, and started Firefox. When I started up, I saw the add-ons dialog indicating that one new add-on had been installed, but when I loaded my test javascript, it wouldn't resolve Components.classes[cid]. I also tried copying my standalone DLL directory into the components sub-folder, with the same error message. Any ideas on where I'm going wrong with the new locations? I'm running the XP 3.5.2 standard binaries. Tom, you asked what third party DLLs I'm using -- it's the openssl DLLs ssleay32.dll and libeay32.dll. I'll give copying them directly into \windows\system32 a try, since I believe I will have administrative access to my target machines. Many thanks, Polly _______________________________________________ dev-extensions mailing list dev- ... @lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-extensions El 07/11/10 13:36, Roman Gelbort escribió: Solo eso. Yo suelo cambiar mi tema de iconos al llamado "Cristal". Pero creo que es una de esas cosas que la mayoría ni siquiera sabe que se puede hacer. Tal vez esto debería desconsertar a los nuevos usuarios, pero me ha pasado que por el contrario, casi no los confunde el hecho de que un icono pueda tomar distintas formas. ¿qué clase de experiencias tienen ustedes al respecto? Yo pienso igual les da hasta cierto punto lo mismo ya que si te fijas no hay grandes diferencias entre el tango, cristal, oxygen, por eso siguen trabajando bien, aunque hay que aclarar que esto es solo para linux y si el usuario lo cambia es que lo metio via repositorio de su distro es decir que hasta cierto punto tiene conocimientos basicos. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: disc ... @es.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: disc ... @es.openoffice.org