Verify patient records

Start a flexible program.





======================================================================================================================== Hello! im searching on how to use LDAP queries with Cocoon 2 and found several informations in the docs and the net. Is anybody using the following taglib with Cocoon 2? http://opensource.socialchange.net.au/ldaptaglib/docs/ For me it seems that it only can used with Cocoon 1.8. Are there any other possibilities to use LDAP Queries within XSP Pages? thx, Chris -- KNAPP Logistics Automation http://www.knapp.com Ing. Christian Jölly Tel/FAX: (++43) 316 / 495 1926 / 495 394 Günter-Knapp-Straße 5-7 A-8075 Hart bei Graz -- Support your government, give Echelon/Carnivore something to parse -- AMTAS ATMD ATSC Abdullah Allah communist CIA DD2-N DISA DoD GRU Gregori Irak Iran KGB Kurdish LSD NATO NSTD Natasha ORD RTEM Russia STRAP Saddam Hussein TSP Yugoslavia attack bank bomb classfield cocain compromise defense democracy destroy destruct detonator directorate elections enforce extasy force foreign embassy government grass hashish heroin illegal information international military systems missile million dollars nuclear policital pot power presidental project restricted data revolution rule the world sensitive smuggle spy steal system takeover terrorist top-secret warmod warrior-T weapon weed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I'll second this question. I maintain a fork of CCache 2.4 internal to my workplace, and I'd like to know if there's going to be some active work on ccache. My fork has two changes. First, it's NFS-safe. It removes the use of non-NFS-safe fcntl() file locking and the statistics tracking features that relied on it. Second, it supports a two level cache. Why? With a one-level cache, you have to compromise. You can share the cache among a large number of users to get a high hit rate, or you can use hardlinks to conserve disk space. You cannot safely do both -- it would be too easy for a well-meaning user to change the contents or permissions of their own workspace, and in so doing, unwittingly modify the shared cache. Basically, a two-level cache allows you to do both safely. Those aren't for everyone. The NFS fix is interesting for people stuck with NFS. The two level cache is interesting for cube farmers stuck with any filesystem that doesn't support deduplication. (If you have deduplication, you can set up an ordinary one-level shared cache, disable hardlinks, and you will have a simple, safe and high performance setup that is efficient with disk space.) So maybe this is best kept as a fork. Anyway it seemed like a good time to take a straw poll to see if anyone was interested in those. Anyone? Cheers, John Joel Rosdahl wrote: Hi Tridge and others, The latest ccache version was released over five years ago. What's the future of ccache? The reason I'm asking is that I have been hacking on ccache (more about that in a separate mail), and, if possible, I would prefer to contribute my work to ccache in some way instead of forking my own ccache clone project. So, what's the way forward here? If wanted, I'm open to help (co-)maintaining ccache. Regards, Joel _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list cca ... @lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list cca ... @lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache