Make your name in the gaming world

Start studying now.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ We use sam-fs 5.0 , connected to a sun L500 tape drive. The current sam-fs policy create 2 copies, one of which we export to off-site. The other stays "near-line" for faster staging back. We are thinking of using sam-fs to store domino mailboxes (an archive mailbox containing emails older than say 12 months ) , and allow the users to maintain a link to the archived mailbox in sam-fs. Q. Is there any way to configure the sam-fs system to allow the user to open (after stage back) and browse the mailbox without requiring any special settings in domino server ?? Q. if a user acts upon a single archived emails item, the mailbox would actually be updated. Can SAM-FS be made to automatically re-archive the file if its contents are changed. If so, what happens to the old copy stored on tape ? does it just become orphaned and the new file is re-archived? This is ok, as the event would be infrequent. also the recycling of tapes could purge any "stale' copies on the tapes. Rgds Chris Hansen Host Systems Production Manager NSW Industry and Investment 161 Kite Street, Orange NSW 2800 Ph (02) 6391 3253 Fax (02) 6391 3290 Email: chri ... @industry.nsw.gov.au This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of their organisation. _______________________________________________ sam-qfs-discuss mailing list sam- ... @opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sam-qfs-discuss Dear Jarrod, You asked about ASReml's na.include=Y option. No, this does not do any fancy imputation or augmentation like MCMCglmm does either. As you can read on p113 of the user guide (p139 of the pdf) http://www.vsni.co.uk/downloads/asreml/release3/UserGuide.pdf !mvinclude just imputes zeros. This obviously assumes centred covariates. For factors, another factor level is created. Damian Damian Collins, Biometrician, I&I NSW dami ... @industry.nsw.gov.au Dear Doug, Perhaps I misunderstand Rubin's missing data theory, and/or perhaps its not relevant to Thierry's problem. I was under the impression that if the probability of missingness depends on the value observed for some other data (MAR), then by including this data and structuring the likelihood correctly then correct inferences (i.e. in the absence of missingness) could be made. Given that the default na.action of lmer seems to deletes other data (complete case analysis), it is hard to see how the other data can be used to 'correct' for missingness. MCMCglmm uses augmentation for missing data. Internally, this is often used just to simplify/speed up the matrix operations using dummy data. However, I had presumed that if users really did have MAR data then the augmentation would take care of this. I know ASReml has an na.includeY argument so presumably there is something to be gained by not reducing the problem to a complete-case analysis, but perhaps this function is there just to allow users to make predictions for missing data points. I know the asreml team read this list, so perhaps they could comment? Cheers, Jarrod, This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of their organisation. _______________________________________________ R-si ... @r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models